the science of the sitcom

topic posted Thu, June 9, 2005 - 12:41 PM by  RAB
www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,...0,00.html

"There are long-standing golden rules for sitcom," said Dr Pilcher, "but our findings bring them down to this single equation. Comedic value is determined by multiplying the recognisability of the main character (R) by their delusions of grandeur (D). This is added to the verbal wit of the script (V) and the total is multiplied by the amount someone falls over or suffers a physical injury (F).

"The difference in social status between the highest- and lowest-ranking characters (S) is added and finally the total is divided by the success of any scheme or stratagem in the show (A). Each term in the formula is assigned a value up to a maximum of 10 to give an overall scientific score."
posted by:
RAB
offline RAB
New York City
  • Re: the science of the sitcom

    Fri, June 10, 2005 - 7:47 AM
    Sounds like "The Thermodynamics of Gilligan's Island" to me.... but then again, Sherwood Schwartz really did know what he was doing and who can argue with success?

    Cool post ...thanks!
    • Re: the science of the sitcom

      Fri, June 10, 2005 - 6:30 PM
      One interesting thing about this idea is that since there's no objective way to come up with numbers for those variables, your score for a given sitcom may be different from someone else's score for the same show...but by comparing how different shows break down, it helps describe why you find something funnier than than something else.

      Gilligan's Island had recognizable characters and their delusions of grandeur were high -- the ongoing gag of constructing substitutes for modern amenities out of coconuts and such is a grand delusional folly -- and may have been lacking in verbal wit but had plenty of slapstick. On the other hand, Beverly Hillbillies or I Dream Of Jeannie had none of the other factors and relied entirely on the physical slapstick, and I find those completely unfunny.
      • Re: the science of the sitcom

        Mon, June 13, 2005 - 7:20 AM
        Good point.... I think "I Dream of Jeannie" and "The Beverly Hillbillies" were both for people who didn’t' 'get' "Gilligan's Island". This is the same idea as people who manufacture name brand items (for instance Tide clothes detergent) and will use the exact same ingredients to fill their own generic-brand containers to sell at a discounted amount (such as ABC laundry soap). The manufacturer basically captures a larger share of the market (name brand buyers AND cost conscious consumers) with the exact product; the only production costs incurred are the different labels and/or bottles.

        I think Hillbillies did rely on delusions of grandeur. Doesn't everyone wish they would uncover something in their immediate possession which would have limitless and immediate commercial value (e.g. finding the original copies of Theodore Geissel’s draft for "Cat in the Hat" unknowingly purchased at a garage sale and inadvertently stored in your attic for the past 40 years). Further, Jeannie is the most basic delusion of grandeur as you have all of your wishes magically attended to….. not unlike the Kings, Queens and Emperors of the greatest civilizations.

        My take is ... the science of the sitcom is to thoroughly engage the viewer's imagination to the point of disallowing anything else to vie for attention during the time one watches the show. The more able you are to get the largest amount of viewers to identify with the main character(s) and the events in the context of the show, the more commercially successful the sitcom will be. This may be why certain reality shows, such as Survivor, became surprisingly but immensely popular ….

        Getting back to Gilligan's Island ... isn't that what we were all thinking when watching the program: “If I was xxxx I would do xxxx and we'd all be saved”? Comedians have used this stream-of-consciousness rambling effectively for getting a laugh: "What is with the Professor on Gilligan's Island? He can make a radio out of coconuts and bamboo but can’t seem to fix the hull of the S.S. Minnow? I mean, what’s up with THAT, dude?”

        By the way … I, too, didn’t really like “Hillbillies” or “Jeannie” and can count the episodes of both shows watched on a single hand. I was much more of a “Munsters” fan meself!
  • Re: the science of the sitcom

    Wed, June 29, 2005 - 7:20 AM
    ((( ((R x D) + V)) x F ))) ?

    As long as that F is such a heavy modifier, though, 'Three's Company' will be the funniest show that ever existed.

    (Personally, I'd add another modifier, (L), for the presence of a laughtrack. But that's just my personal taste.)

Recent topics in "The frustrated comedy writer"